Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (10) TMI 1018

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... The petitioners in both these writ petitions are one and the same. The petitioner is a small scale industrial unit engaged in the manufacture and sale of treated rubber wood, furniture items and building materials. In these writ petitions, the short issue that arises for consideration is whether the petitioner is entitled for the benefit of exemption of purchase tax payable under S.5A of Kerala ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed Tax, 2003, the Government of Kerala, having considered it necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby make an exemption in respect of the purchase tax payable under Section 5A of the said Act on the turnover of purchase of Rubber Wood used in the manufactures of other products of Rubber Wood processing units within the State for the period from 1.4.1997 to 19.3.2004 subject to the conditi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Senior Government Pleader also relied upon the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Mayil Vahanam Marketing v. Additional Sales Tax Officer, Ottappalam and Others [(2008) 12 VST 296 (Ker)]. It is to be noted that the ratio in the Mayil Vahanam's case is different from the ratio involved in this case. In that case where the petitioners were dealers under the KGST Act and the Central....