Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (7) TMI 13

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Tribunal has referred the following questions for the opinion of this court: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in upholding the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961? Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in concluding th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing the correct income, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was initiated and penalty of Rs. 16,500 has been imposed. In appeal the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) has confirmed the penalty. In appeal before the Tribunal, the Tribunal also confirmed the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal while following the order in the case of the same assessee, for the assessment years 19....