Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (10) TMI 646

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for respondent ORDER Per: Ramesh Nair 1. The fact of the case is that the appellant cleared Colour Television of various sizes and models to their godown/branches situated at various places. The CTVs so cleared were assessed to duty on Retail Sale Price (RSP). During the scrutiny of records, it was noticed that the appellant has lowered the RSP of CTVs during the period July 1999 to Septe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... before the Commissioner (Appeals), who concurring with the view of adjudicating authority upheld the order-in-original and rejected the appeal. 2. Shri H.P. Kanade, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the fact is that during the effective date of revision of MRP and issue of circular, CTVs were sold at the reduced prices and subsequently credit notes were issued. He s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sold on higher MRP than the MRP on the basis of which the excise duty was paid. 4. Shri M.R. Melvin, Ld. Superintendent, (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings in the impugned order. 5. We have carefully considered the submissions made by both sides. We find that the entire demand was raised on the assumption that the price difference between the branch of the appell....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....time of clearance of the goods and payment of duty thereon. We find that as regards the assessment of the value of the goods governed by Section 4A, the actual transaction between the manufacturer and the dealer is immaterial the only aspect to be ascertained is whether the excise duty paid on the basis of the MRP declared on the products at which the goods were sold. In the fact of the present ca....