Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (9) TMI 1480

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri Arun Kanti Bhattacharjee, Consultant for the Respondent (s) ORDER Per: Shri P. K. Choudhary The facts of the case in brief are that the respondents are engaged in the manufacture of printed and laminated plastic rolls and pouches classifiable under Chapter 39 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. During the audit by the audit team of Kolkata-VII Commissioner....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....consumption of ink. It is also submitted that the respondent admitted the clandestine clearance of finished goods by way of making payment of differential amount of duty. On perusal of the impugned order, I find that the respondent, in order to avoid the litigation paid an amount of Rs. 1,40,948/- as their calculation mistake. The Commissioner (Appeals) observed that the respondent have not filed ....