Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (9) TMI 1441

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Commissioner (AR), for Respondent ORDER Per: Anil Choudhary The issue in this appeal is, whether the appellant who had deposited the tax, as their claim for being exempt under Notification No. 74/93-CE dated 28/02/1993, was not accepted by the Department and subsequently when the matter came to be settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the appellant applied for refund, whether the same ha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Commissioner Versus Electricity Pole Manufacturing (A Unit of U. P. State Electricity Board) reported at 2006 (202) E.L.T. A-144 dismissed the appeal of Revenue holding that since the entire capital of U. P. State Electricity Board was provided by U. P. State Government and although this board was not "State" within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India, it was the State Governmen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rovisions of Section 11B read with Explanation No. B (f) under the Central Excise Act, 1944. 4. Being aggrieved the appellant preferred appeal before ld. Commissioner (Appeals) who vide the impugned order was pleased to reject the appeal upholding the Order-in-Original dated 31/01/2008. 5. Being aggrieved the appellant is in appeal before this Tribunal. The learned Counsel for the appellant argu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....evenue deposit, there is no limitation. Further, the learned Counsel relies on the ruling of Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Wimco Ltd. Versus Union of India reported at 1989 (43) E.L.T. 628 (Allahabad) wherein under the fact that the assessee had claimed set off of duty after clearance of goods, which was not allowed by the Department in spite of appellate order. The Hon'ble High ....