Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (9) TMI 1334

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Revenue ORDER Per: Shri P.K. Choudhary The appellant is in the business of export of iron ore fines. Shipping Bill No.007301 dated 04.12.2008 was filed through the Customs House Agent for export of 20,000 MT of iron ore fines. After filing of the shipping bills, the appellants deposited Rs. 30,23,520/- into the Customs House Treasury. Subsequently no export took place at all as the appel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... order of clearance and loading and not prior to that since the rate of duty cannot be ascertained prior to that. He further contends that any alleged assessment made prior to the date of order of clearance and loading of the export goods is based purely on assumptions. 3. The ld. A.R. reiterates the findings of the Commissioner(Appeals). 4. Heard both sides and perused the appeal records. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The ld. A.R. relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mafatlal Industries Ltd. v. Union of India [1997 (89) E.L.T. 247 (SC)]. But, the lower authorities had not examined the facts of the case particularly the assessment of the shipping bills as contended by the ld. Counsel on behalf of the appellants. 7. In my considered view, the case laws would be applicable afte....