Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (9) TMI 1236

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... less than the market value, if so whether the tax can be levied on notional profits or on actual profits? iii) Whether the principles of assessing the value of the stock of a dissolved firm for assessing the mutual adjustment of partner's shares can be applied to a running company?. 2. The facts giving rise to the filing of this appeal briefly stated are that there was a change in the Management and Shareholdings of the Company. M/s Janki Motor Pvt. Ltd. was having dealership rights for sale of vehicles etc. of Maruti Udyog Ltd. In the aforesaid company, one Krishan Kumar and Ushal Amla were the shareholders and Directors having 4 lacs equity shares of Rs. 10 per share. By an agreement dated 26.07.2001, the Directors agreed to trans....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... term capital gains by Assessing Officer, which was withdrawn. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowed the appeal. Being aggrieved the Revenue approached the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal set aside the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and restored the order of the Assessing Officer. In the aforesaid factual background, this appeal has been filed. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that principle which is to be applied while dissolving the firm cannot be applied to continue the Company. It is further submitted that the Tribunal has failed to appreciate that the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of A.L.A. Firm vs. C.I.T 189 ITR 285 has no application to the fact situation of the ....