2017 (9) TMI 1062

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ltant  for the Appellant/Assessee Shri  S.Mukhopadhyay, Supdt.(AR) for the Revenue ORDER Per Shri P.K.Choudhary. Appeal No.E/219/10 has been filed by the assessee against the order of denial of refund claim under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and Appeal No.E/58/12 has been filed by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner(Appeals) allowing the assessee s appeal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....et aside the adjudication order and allowed the refund claim of Rs. 4,53,621/- for the period July to September, 2006. Hence, both sides filed the appeals. 3. Heard both sides and perused the appeal records. 4. The ld.Consultant appearing on behalf of the assesses submits that as per the provisions of Notification No.43/2001-CE(NT) dated 26.06.2001 as amended, the law is abundantly clear in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r export under Bond. In  the present case the OTS cans were cleared under Bond to the fruit pulp manufacturers, who, in turn exported the goods. In any event, it is required to be verified from the records of the export of the goods. In such identical situation, the Tribunal in the case of Western Cans P.Ltd. v. Commissioner of C.Ex., Mumbai-I [2011 (270) E.L.T. 101 (Tri.-Mumbai)] held as und....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... In this case, the appellant has brought on record the evidences showing that the goods supplied by them to 100% EOU have finally been exported physically. Therefore, they are entitled to rebate claim. We have seen the impugned orders, both the lower authorities have not verified the documents whether the goods supplied by the appellants to 100% EOU have finally been exported physically or not. Th....