Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (7) TMI 1326

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Mr. Suvir Sehgal, Addl. A.G.Punjab, Mr. P.S.Thiara, Advocate, for the respondent JUDGEMENT ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. (Oral) 1. The appellant is aggrieved by order of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition against the order of detention dated 5.3.2004 under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 ( for short, "the Act....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....wherein he was said to have admitted his role in the racket. Notice was issued to the petitioner proposing to arrest him. Thereafter, the matter of preventive detention of the petitioner was taken up on a proposal from the DRI. The petitioner was arrested by the custom officials on 30.9.2003 and was produced before the Court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Ahmedabad. Thereafter, the i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eld in Mrs.Arvind Shergill v. Union of India 1999(4) R.C.R. (Crl.) 781. It was further held that in absence of order dated 5.3.2004 and any material to indicate as to what happened after 4.6.2004, when the petitioner was declared a proclaimed offender, it was improper to quash the order which was not on record. Reliance was placed on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Surrender Singh v. Central ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of Punjab and others), wherein following the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajinder Arora V. Union of India [2006] 4 SCC 796, order of detention was quashed. Reliance has also been made on the judgment of the Hon'ble Suprme Court in Alpesh Navinchandra Shah v. State of Maharashtra (SC) 2007(2) R.C.R.(Crl.) 180. Reliance has also been placed on the judgment of this Court in Adi....