2016 (8) TMI 1269

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nniappan For the Respondent : K. Venkatesh ORDER Heard Mr.R.Senniappan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent. 2. The petitioner-Company, which is a registered dealer on the file of the respondent under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax, 2006 (hereinafter referred as "TNVAT Act"), has fil....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the notice of this Court to show that the manual forms cannot be accepted. 5. The issue as to whether the delay in filing the Forms could be a ground to deny refund, came up for consideration before this Court in a case of R.K.Knits V. Assistant Commissioner (CT) (MAD) reported in [2015] 84 VST 521 (Mad), wherein, the Court pointed out that admittedly, the dealers turnover relate to an export t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n by giving necessary details along with the Input Tax Credit refund claim and the proper course for the Assistant Commissioner would be to take up the Assessment expeditiously to consider the claim and pass order. The said decision was subsequently followed by this Court in the case of FIRST GARMENT MFG. Co. (INDIA) v. ASST. COMMR. (MAD) reported in [2016] 88 VST 154 (Mad). 6. In the instant c....