2017 (9) TMI 28

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri R. Subramaniyan, AC (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER The brief facts of the case are that the appellants, an 100% EOU, manufacturers of cut and polished Granite monuments, filed refund claims under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, read with Notification No. 5/2006-C.E. (N.T.), dated 14-3-2006, for refund of unutilized Cenvat credit lying in their books....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....owed by the ld. Commissioner (Appeals). After due process of law, the original authority while sanctioning an amount of Rs. 55,900/-, Rs. 48,731/- and Rs. 84,191/- , however rejected the claim of the appellants on "Manpower Supply" on the ground that appellants on their own volition had apportioned certain amount of service tax initially claimed by them under the head "Telephone and Erection" unde....