AI OCR 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2017 (8) TMI 1295
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....373 ITR 268] submits that levy of fee u/s 234E is constitutionally valid. He further submits that when there is delay in filing TDS statements fee u/s 234E is attracted for the delay and since in all these cases there is a delay in filing the TDS statements the Assessing Officer is perfectly justified in levying fee u/s 234E of the Act while passing the intimation u/s 200A of the Act. 4. We have heard the Ld.DR, perused the orders of the authorities below. We find that considering the decision relied upon by the Ld.DR in the case of Rashmikant Kundalia v. Union of India (supra), the Coordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Concept Management Consulting Limited in ITA.Nos. 4428 to 4437/Mum/2015 dated 24.08.2016 decided this issue in favour of the assessee following another decision of the Coordinate Bench in the case of M/s Kash Realtors P Ltd & others in ITA.No.4199/Mum/2015 dated 27.07.2016 wherein the Coordinate Bench considering various decisions held that no fee is leviable u/s 234E in the intimation passed u/s 200A prior to 01.06.2015. While holding so the Coordinate Bench held as under: - "In this bunch of 17 appeals, the sole issue involved is as to whether or not,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d therefore the Ld. CIT(A) could have examined the validity of the adjustments made under the intimation under section 200A in the light and scope of the provisions of section 200A. The Tribunal further observed that since there was no enabling provision under section 200A before 01.06.15 providing for the adjustment in respect of levy of fees under section 234E while processing the TDS statements, hence in the absence of such an enabling provision, no such levy could be affected. The provision for making adjustments regarding fees leviable under section 234E has been introduced by way of amendment made vide Finance Act, 2015 w.e.f. 01.06.15 only. The Tribunal therefore held that the action of the AO in making adjustments with regard to the fees leviable under section 234E while processing the TDS statements under section 200A for the period prior to 1.6.2015, was not legally valid. It has therefore been contended on behalf of the assessees that the TDS statements filed by the assessee has to be processed in the manner as laid down in the provisions of section 200A as in force during the relevant period. That the levy of fees under section 234E of the Act, thus, cannot be a subj....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....party is not left remediless rather such aggrieved person can always approach the Hon'ble High Court in extraordinary equitable jurisdiction under article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, as the case may be. 8. However, in the cases before us, the grievance of the assessees is not against the levy of fees under section 234E of the Act independently rather, the issue is that while processing the TDS statements under section 200A of the Act, whether or not, the fees leviable under section 234E can be adjusted therein? No doubt, the order passed under section 200A is an appealable order before the Ld. CIT(A) under section 246 of the Act (w.e.f. 1.7.2012). The appellate order of the Ld. CIT(A) passed under 250 of the Act is further appealable before this Tribunal under section 253 of the Act. Hence, we do not find any illegality in the course adopted by the assessees of invoking the appealable jurisdiction of this Tribunal for redressal of their grievance on this issue. 9. So far as the issue whether for the period prior to 01.06.15, such adjustment can be made while processing the statements under section 200A of the Act is concerned, we find that the Amritsar Bench of the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ng such a period the failure continues. Referring to the word used in the section 234E "he shall be liable to pay", the Ld.counsel pointed out that the assessee is liable to pay fee. However, it does not empower the Assessing Officer to levy the fee. Section 234E(3) of the Act provides for payment of the fee before delivery of statement under Section 200(3) of the Act. Therefore, the fee has to be paid by the assessee voluntarily before filing the statement under Section 200(3) of the Act and the assessing authority has no power to levy the fee. 5. On the contrary, Sh. P. Radhakrishnan, the Ld. Departmental Representative, submitted that Section 234E of the Act provides for payment of fee, if the assessee fails to deliver the statement as prescribed in Section 200(3) of the Act. Therefore, the Assessing Officer has every authority to levy fee either by a separate order or while processing the statement under Section 200A of the Act. 6. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material on record. Section 200A of the Act provides for processing of the statement of tax deducted at source by making adjustment as provided in that Section. Fo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n (1) of clauses (c) to (e). For the purpose of convenience, we are reproducing the amendment made in Section 200A by the Finance Act, 2015 as under:- "In section 200A of the Income-tax Act, in sub-section (1), for clauses (c) to (e), the following clauses shall be substituted with effect from the 1st day of June, 2015, namely:- "(c) the fee, if any, shall be computed in accordance with the provisions of section 234E; (d) the sum payable by, or the amount of refund due to, the deductor shall be determined after adjustment of the amount computed under clause (b) and clause (c) against any amount paid under section 200 or section 201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause (d); and (f) the amount of refund due to the deductor in pursuance of the determination under clause (d) shall be granted to the deductor." Therefore, it is obvious that prior to 01.06.2015, there was no enabling provision in Section 200A of the Act for making adjustment in respect of the st....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the Act. 9. The contention of the assessee can also be examined in the light of the provisions of Indian Penal Code. Section 396 of Indian Penal Code provides for punishment for dacoity with murder. The punishment is imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may be extended to ten years and also liable to fine. For the purpose of convenience, we are reproducing Section 396 of Indian Penal Code, hereunder:- "396. Dacoity with murder - If any one of five or more persons, who are conjointly committing dacoity, commits murder in so committing dacoity, every one of those persons shall be punished with death, or imprisonment for life, or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine." Similarly, Section 408 of Indian Penal Code provides for criminal breach of trust by a clerk or servant. In addition to imprisonment which may extend to seven years, the accused who is found to be guilty shall also be liable to fine. Similarly, the other provisions of Indian Penal Code also say that in addition to imprisonment, the accused shall be liable to pay fine. The language used by the Parliament in Indian Penal Code is....