2005 (8) TMI 710

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ld fall under section 69C of the Income-tax Act ?" 2. In order to appreciate the issue involved, few relevant facts need to be mentioned. 3. The appellant - an assessee is a proprietor of one concern known as Mahavir Ginning Factory at Kukshi. He is engaged in the business of Ginning. In his manufacturing activity, the appellant is required to purchase cotton. 4. In the assessment year in question (1992-93), the dispute arose on certain purchases made by the assessee of cotton from some agriculturists, amounting to ₹ 3,00,779. In order to decide this issue, the Assessing Officer called those agriculturists from whom the assessee claimed to have purchased the cotton. They were twice examined. In the first instance, their statem....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused record of the case, we are inclined to allow the appeal, set aside the impugned order and remand the case to the Tribunal for deciding the appeal afresh on merits. 7. Since, we have formed an opinion to remand the case to Tribunal and hence, we do not wish to give any finding on merits nor we wish to take note of the facts in detail except what we have narrated supra for appreciating the issue sought to be urged by the parties in these proceedings. 8. In our opinion, the need to remand has arisen on account of following finding recorded by the Tribunal while allowing the appeal of Revenue as contained in para 6 of the impugned order :- "We have also perused the....