2016 (2) TMI 1111

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... filed by the Revenue is directed against the order of the CIT(A)-XXIII, dated 31/01/2013 passed in first appeal No. 254/11-12 for A.Y 2009-10. 2. The Revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal: "1. On the facts and on the circumstances of the case the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 2,76,21,682/- made by the AO, by following the order of 1TAT Delhi whereas the depa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....enue is squarely covered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue by the consolidated order of the Tribunal dated 10.2.2011 in assessee's own case for A.Y 2008-09. The ld. CIT(A), at para 4 of his order, deleted the addition of Rs. 2,76,21,682/- by following the Tribunal order [supra] as the issue in question was squarely covered by the decision of the Tribunal in assessee's own case. Acc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the concern while filing details on 11.10.2011 before the AO and the AO and the assessee acknowledged the error in his reply dated 16.12.2011. Not satisfied with the explanation tendered by the assessee, the AO added the sum of Rs. 24,12,676/- to the income of the assessee. Aggrieved, the assessee went in appeal before the ld. CIT(A), who deleted the same. Now the Revenue is in appeal before the ....