Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (8) TMI 651

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the appellant, is bad and unsustainable in the eye of law. 2. CIT (A) grossly erred in confirming the treatment of income from business as income from house property, without properly appreciating facts in proper perspective; and hence the addition was bad in law. 3. Without prejudice, the CIT (A) ought to have appreciated that even memorandum of association as well as Articles of Association mandated the letting/leasing and hence the income there from was nothing but business income under S.28 of the Act and hence ought to have held that the addition as made by the AO was unsustainable in the eye of law. 4. Without prejudice, the CIT (A) ought to have allowed netting of the expenditure, incurred towards staff, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....itted that the assessee has leased out its business asset being factory premises due to the reason that the textile business of the assessee was discontinued. He has further contended that due to the recession in the business the assessee discontinued the business of textile mill and let out the factory building. He has further submitted that the leasing out of the plant and machinery and building is provided as business activity of the assessee as per Article of Association and Memorandum of Association. He has referred to Clauses 14 to 17, 37 to 39 of Memorandum of Association and submitted that in accordance with the clauses of Memorandum of Association leasing out the plant, furniture, etc to commercial undertaking is a business activit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l and let out the factory premises to the following persons : i) Professional Marketing Group. ii) Frontline Marketing. iii) Indras Agency. It is also not disputed that leasing of plant and machinery, godown, and building is one of the business objects of the assessee company as per the Article of Association and Memorandum of Association. It is not the case of the assessee that it has temporarily closed the business activity due to some lull, but the business of textile mill has been permanently discontinued. Therefore the business asset of the assessee company were let out to different persons. Since the assessee has received the rentals from letting out of not the building structure only but it is a factory ....