AI OCR 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2017 (8) TMI 554
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s agency service. As per the agreement the Appellant had received 3% on passenger ticket sales and 2.5% on cargo sales transportation overseas as over-riding commission. Department issued Show Cause Notices proposing imposition of service tax on the overriding commission and the incentives received from Saudia on the ground that the receipts received as overriding commission do not fall under Export of Services and incentives received forms part of the taxable value under the category of Business Auxiliary Service. These proposals were confirmed / upheld by lower authorities along with interest thereon and also imposition of penalties under various provisions of law. Aggrieved, the appellants have filed these appeals before this forum. 3. On 22.07.2017, when the matter came up for hearing, on behalf of appellant, Ld. Consultant Shri R. Viswanathan submitted a table of the issues involved in the appeals filed by them, which is extracted below for ready reference : Appeal No. Year/Period Issue Notn. applicable Export Rules ST/214/2007 1.7.2003 to 30.6.2006 1.7.2003 to 15.3.2005 Denial of Export for ORC Circular No.56/5/03 dt. 5-4-2003 -do- 16.3.2005 to 19.4.2006 19.04.2006....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ion work of the Appellant, the turnover of Saudi Arabian Airlines only goes up and all the sales of tickets are revenues of a foreign airlines company. vii) All notices, requests, demands, instructions, communications shall be sent only to Saudi Arabian Airlines, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. This clause shows that all communications to the Airline has to be sent only to Saudi Arabia. viii) The Agreement itself has been executed in Saudi Arabia. The contract has also been executed outside India and the service receiver is Saudi Arabian Airlines located outside India. ix) The very fact that the Overriding Commission (ORC) is being calculated on net flown revenue shows that only when the business is achieved and the turnover in Saudi Arabia is calculated, therefore the Appellant qualifies for ORC. x) The Appellant provided services in relation to business or commerce to Saudi Arabian Airlines, which is a recipient located outside India. xi) The proviso to Rule 3(1) clearly states that in case the foreign recipient has an office in India, the order has to come from an office located outside India. In the instant case, the agreement appointing the Appellant as General Sales Agent has been....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....under BAS. The services provided by the GSA to Saudia cannot be considered as export of service under Rule 3(3) of Export of Service Rules, 2005, in as much as, the appellant has provided the service within a limited territory, which is within India and further action in and outside India are taken care of by Saudia. Therefore, they have not satisfied the main condition, i.e., the services so ordered are delivered outside India and used in business outside India. (ii) The agreement clearly demarcates the jurisdiction (Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Kerala) beyond which the appellant do not have any role to play on behalf of Saudia. (iii) The appellants responsibility ceases after issue of Ticket/Airway bills on all further activities on any claims, demand, cost which are undertaken by Saudia. (iv) The appellant has to provide one office at Chennai and Cochin to Saudia and should also provide administrative service to Saudia in India in its relation with Government Agency and General Public within its territory. It is further noted that as per the agreement the appellant should provide an office to Saudia so as to be identifiable as Saudi Airlines. (v) Appellant has n....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....icket stock. Paras II & III also contains the entitlement of normal commission/overriding commission to GSA. In terms of the above agreement, the assessee admittedly are in receipt of 3% ORC on passenger sales and 2.5% on cargo sales. 7.4. The appellant has prima facie accepted that the overriding commission falls under the category of service BAS and is chargeable to tax accordingly. However, the appellants contention is that the service is rendered to Saudia as the part of the above agreement and the same is to be treated as export of services and therefore the appellant has pleaded that they are exempted from payment of service tax. As regards the terms of payment in Indian Rupees which militates against the conditions stipulated under export of service rules, the appellant has contended that initially before the investigation started, the amount payable as ORC was deducted by the appellant from the proceeds and the balance amount only was remitted to Saudia. The credit notes for deduction of ORC was issued by the local office of Saudia in Chennai. After initiation of investigation by the Department, the mode of payment has been changed from rupees to foreign currency. 7.5 The....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....side India; (b) service so ordered is delivered outside India and used in business outside India; and (c) payment for such service provided is received by the service provider in convertible foreign exchange; (ii) such taxable services which are provided and used, other than in or in relation to commerce or industry, if the recipient of the taxable service is located outside India at the time when such services are received. Explanation.-For the purpose of this rule Indiaincludes the designated areas in the Continental Shelf and Exclusive Economic Zone of India as declared by the notifications of the Government of India in the Ministry of External Affairs Nos. S.O.429(E), dated the 18th July, 1986 and S.O.643(E), dated the 19th September, 1996." 7.7 Subsequently, vide Notification No.13/2006-ST, Rule 3 was amended inter alia as under : (2) The provision of any taxable service shall be treated a export of service when the following conditions are satisfied, namely :- (a) such service is delivered outside India and used outside India; and (b) payment for such service provided outside India is received by the service provider in convertible foreign exchange. Thereafte....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. It is also clear that scope of these services to be provided by the appellant included soliciting, promoting and selling passenger air transportation for Saudia, assistance in all operations likely to encourage traffic on Saudia's Airlines. Evidently, these activities performed by the appellants are contracted to have beneficial impact on air transportation traffic on Saudi Airlines. Although the appellants have been contracted as Saudias GSA for the territory of Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Kerala, appellant as a GSA is authorized to make sales over the services of Saudia and any other carrier with whom Saudia has interline traffic agreements. Soliciting and promoting of passenger air transportation is permitted to be done by the appellant on all lines awarded out by Saudia. Similarly, in the General Sales Agreement for Cargo entered into between the Saudi Arabian Airlines Corporation, Jeddah Office and the appellant, like air passenger transportation, the appellant in the GSA Agreement for cargo is similarly required to provide commercial services to Saudia including soliciting, promoting and selling cargo and mailing transportation for ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....als have relied upon the said decision. We find that in the ETA Travels case, appellant therein had received commission from the airlines by way of credit notes. The credit notes mentioned the amounts in terms of Indian rupee and such amounts were credited to the appellants bank account. The Tribunal held that no part of the overriding commission (ORC) was received by way of inward remittance in convertible foreign exchange. Hence ORC received cannot be considered as receipts of convertible foreign exchange. Ld.A.R for Revenue has pointed out that this decision was followed by the Tribunal in the case of Trans Lanka Air Travel Pvt. Ltd. Vs CST Chennai - 2007 (7) STR 476 (Tri.-Chennai). While this maybe so, however, the appellants have argued that ETA Travels decision has been stayed by the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in C.M.A.No.2359/2007 vide order dt. 26.10.2007. It has been confirmed by Revenue that the matter has still not been decided by Hon'ble High Court. We also note that the very same High Court of Madras, which is the jurisdictional High Court for this Tribunal, in a recent judgment in the case of Suprasesh General Insurance Services & Brokers (P) Ltd. [2015] 62 taxmann.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....remitted to foreign insurer in foreign exchange, such Indian rupees was obtained in lieu of foreign exchange the same will be deemed to be convertible exchange. The Tribunal decision also took note of Foreign Exchange Management Act provision that if payment in Indian rupees is received through banking channel its deemed to be convertible foreign exchange. 11. We are informed that CESTAT Delhi in the case of Bird Travels (P) Ltd. Vs CCE Delhi - 2016 (45) STR 143 (Tri.-Del.), inter alia, placing reliance on decision in ETA Travels (supra) has taken a contrary view. However, by the principle of stare decisis this Tribunal is enjoined to follow the law laid down by the jurisdictional High Court of Madras in the case of Suprasesh General Insurance Services cited (supra). We are aware that the Suprasesh judgment has been appealed against by the department and the Hon'ble Apex Court after condoning the delay has issued notice, as reported in 2016 (43) STR J22 (SC), however as no stay of the Suprasesh judgement has been ordered by the Hon'ble Apex Court, we intend to follow the ratio thereof as laid down by the High Court of Madras. 12. No doubt, the proviso in Rule 3 (3) of Exp....