2013 (6) TMI 829

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....its return declaring income of Rs. 1,12,61,88,270/-. The assessment was completed on total income of Rs. 112,85,33,870/-, inter alia, making following additions:- 1. Disallowance of Rs. 2 lakhs on account of non-verifiability of various expenses incurred by assessee. 2. Disallowance of Rs. 3,04,397/- on account of difference in rate of depreciation of computer peripherals allowed by Assessing Officer @15% as against 60% claimed by the assessee. 3. Disallowance of Rs. 12,04,205/- on account of difference in rate of depreciation allowed by Assessing Officer @ 15% as against of 60% claimed by the assessee in regard to computer software. 3. Ld. CIT(A) deleted all the aforementioned three disallowances. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y specific instance of non-verifiability of expenses. He has not pointed out under which head the disallowance was made. The assessee company had itself declared taxable income of Rs. 1,12,61,88,270/- and, therefore, a meager disallowance of Rs. 2 lakhs, without any basis, was wholly unwarranted. Assessing officer has not brought on record any material to justify the disallowance of Rs. 2 lakhs. The disallowance made on estimated basis cannot be sustained. Ld. CIT(A) has rightly relied on the following decisions in this regard: "i) Umacharan Shah & Bros Vs. CIT (1959) 37 ITR 271 (SC) ii) Lalchand Bhagat Ambica Ram Vs. CIT (1959) 37 ITR 288 (SC) iii) CIT Vs. Kulwant Rai 291 ITR 36 (Delhi High Court) by following th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cision of the jurisdictional Hon'ble Delhi High Court in following cases :- "i. BSEC Rajdhani Powers Ltd. (Del) ITA No. 1266/2010, dated 31.03.2010 ii. CIT Vs. Sony India Pvt. Ltd., ITA No. 1178/2011 iii. CIT Vs. Datacraft India Ltd. (2010) 133 TTJ 377 iv. Expeditors International (India) (P.) Ltd. Vs. Addl. CIT (2008) 13 DTR (Del.) (Trib.) 435 v. Haworth (India) (P.) Ltd. Vs. DCIT (2011) 11 taxmann.com 76 (Delhi) vi. Carlton Overseas (P.) Ltd. Vs. DCIT (2011) 14 taxmann.com 97 (Delhi) vii. ACIT Vs. Chrys Capital Investment Advisors India Pvt. Ltd. 45 SOT 71 (Delhi) (URO)" Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of BSEC RAJDHANI POWERS Ltd.(ITA NO. 1266/2010) has held that....