2016 (6) TMI 1223

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the issue have not been appreciated. (b) The addition of Rs. 83,17,322/- representing the cost of material purchase including transportation charges and appearing as credit balances could not have been sustained u/s 68. 2. That the ld. CIT(A), has erred in refusing to admit additional evidence in the shape of affidavits of certain Truck Drivers filed during the appellate proceedings." 2. The brief facts of the cases are that the assessee is a contractor engaged in road construction/repair. During the year, the assessee had made purchases of material and the amount outstanding to suppliers was reflected in terms of the truck number. Such creditors were Rs. 83,13,191/- as against total creditors of Rs. 1,41,17,200/-. In response to a q....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....id immediately. The explanation given by the assessee was not accepted by the AO by stating the following reasons: 1) The assessee had failed to prove genuineness of credits in the name of vehicle owners and the summons were not served on the creditors and the assessee did not produce the creditors. 2) The expenditure of Freight, Octroi & Cartage is higher is the last quarter. Expense up to Dec., 2008 is with reference to persons whereas the subsequent expense is with reference to truck numbers. Also excess expenditure appears to have been incurred to evade tax. 3) Confirmations of credit balances in the name of the vehicle numbers are not genuine as the summons sent at the given address were received back unserved. 4) The assessee ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the impugned order, has contended that mere entries were made by the assessee and no material whatsoever was supplied and, therefore, the provisions of section 68 of the Act are squarely attracted and were rightly applied. 6. Having heard the rival contentions in the light of the material available on record, it is seen that in para-3 of the assessment order, the AO observed that the assessee had shown numerous sundry creditors along with details, as was available from the examination of the assessee's books of account vis-à-vis his balance sheet. The assessee is a road contractor. He received material for the construction of the road. The amounts in question represented purchases made on credits. The provisions of section 68 of the....