2017 (4) TMI 1238

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant Commissioner (AR) For the Respondent : Hrishikesh, Advocate ORDER Anil Choudhary (Judicial Member) The present appeal is filed by the revenue against Order-in-Appeal No. 115-116/CE/NOIDA/09 dated 29/04/2009 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Noida. 2. The respondent M/s Free Scale Semiconductors India (P) Ltd. is a STPI unit having Customs License date....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and hence it could not be considered as an output service provider as per Rule 2(p) of CCR 2004 and hence there was no input service on which Cenvat credit of service tax could be taken under Rule 2 (l)(i) and rule 6 (1) of CCR, 2004. 5. The said ground is not sustainable for the reason that had such Cenvat credit been not admissible, the Revenue could have issued show cause notice for recover....