Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1970 (11) TMI 40

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sessment that has been made for the year 1958-59 on the deceased assessee, Mukundan, in relation to which assessment we answered two questions just now in the Income-tax Referred Case No. 66 of 1968. We held therein that the income-tax authorities were justified in treating the sum of Rs. 21,000 as concealed income from other sources of Mukundan and that amount can be taxed. The further question a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....his amendment, the provision in the Explanation must apply and under that provision penalty can be imposed. We do not think that that Explanation can have any relevance for deciding the question of imposition of penalty on the deceased, Mukundan, in relation to the assessment year 1958-59. In a recent decision of this court in I.T.R. No. 8 of 1968 we held that the amendment has no retrospective ef....