Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (7) TMI 396

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in the manufacture of rubber and non-threaded articles. During the course of verification of records by the department, it appeared that the appellants wrongly availed input service credit on Multi Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) service based on invoices issued by BIL, during the period 2010-11 to 2013-14. It emerged that BIL had received MPLS service from M/s. BSNL and M/s. Reliance Communications Ltd., and that the server was situated at the premises of the former. It had further appeared that BIL had utilized MPLS service for communicating and retrieving data from their sub-contractor appellants. BIL raised invoices to the appellants towards reimbursement of the above MPLS charges along with service tax components indicated therein. The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rvice was rendered by BIL, hence, availment of credit of service tax component reflected in those invoices was incorrect. 2.4 Accordingly proceedings were initiated against these appellants proposing demand of service tax credit allegedly availed wrongly, along with interest liability thereon and imposition of penalty under various provisions of Finance Act, 1994 and Rules thereto. These proposals were confirmed in adjudication by the original authorities concerned and on appeal, the Commissioners (Appeals) vide impugned orders upheld the orders of the adjudicating authority. Hence the appellants are before this forum. 3.1 Today when the matter came up for hearing, in respect of M/s. Aztec Auto and M/s. Wichitra Auto Ltd., the Ld. Counsel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erver is utilized to monitor the production and other related activities of the appellants by BIL (b) The MPLS, SAP usage by the appellants through the server of BIL cannot be considered as beneficial service utilized in or in relation to the manufacturing activities or in furtherance of their business. (c) MPLS, SAP services are not utilized by the appellants but only by BIL and only a proportionate cost which is paid by BIL to the actual service providers is being sought to be passed on to the appellants. 5. Heard both sides and gone through the submissions made by both sides. 6.1 From the facts on record it is discernable that MPLS and SAP are utilized by BIL and that too only for the purpose of monitoring the manufacturing activitie....