2017 (7) TMI 290

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a, Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 to 3   ORAL JUDGMENT (PER T.V. NALAWADE, J.): The petition is filed for the relief of quashing of the Attachment Panchnamas dated 06.04.2004, 14.09.2004 and 02.06.2005 in respect of properties of the petitioner, for recovery of the amount of excise duty which was demanded by the respondents. 2. The petition is filed on the ground that proceedi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the petitioner, was to inform this Court about the disposal of the said proceedings before the B.I.F.R. No such step was taken by the petitioner. Today, the learned Counsel for the petitioner has argued a technical point that when the proceedings were pending before the B.I.F.R., the order of attachment could not have been made and so that, it may be set aside. 5. In view of the above, we obser....