2017 (6) TMI 680

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 11.9.2013 passed by the Commissioner (A) wherein the Commissioner (A) has allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue and set aside the Order-in-Original. 2. Briefly the facts of the present case are that appellants are manufacturers of Pan Masala containing Tobacco (also known as Gutkha) falling under Chapter 24 of the Central Excise Tar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....00/- (paid belatedly) @ 18% for 21 days i.e., from 16.6.2011 to 5.7.2011, much later on 18.8.2011. The interest payable/attributable on the excess duty amount of Rs. 1,30,62,500/- (as mentioned above) worked out to Rs. 1,35,277/-. Accordingly they claimed refund of the above interest amount. The original authority after following the due process of law had sanctioned the claim amount of Rs. 1,35,2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ds of appeal taken by them in appeal by the appellant. The appellant has stated in the grounds of appeal that the order passed by the Commissioner (A) is not sustainable in law as the Commissioner (A) has not considered the submissions of the assessee and the binding judicial precedents on the issue. It has been submitted in the written submission that the learned Commissioner (A) while bringing o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... : 2015 (324) ELT 390 (Del.) * CCE Vs. Thakkar Tobacco Products P. Ltd.: 2016 (332) ELT 785 (Guj.) * CCE, Delhi Vs. Som Pan Products Alloys Pvt. Ltd.: 2015 (323) ELT 369 (Tri.-Del.) 5. On the other hand, the learned AR reiterated the findings of the impugned order. 6. After considering the submissions of both the parties, I find that the Commissioner (A) has allowed the appeal of the Depart....