2017 (6) TMI 501
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....akes notice for the respondent and by consent of the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of the respondent dated 30.01.2017 cancelling the registration under the Tamil Nadu VAT Act, 2006 and Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. 3. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the impugned order of cancellation was p....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....unication dated 30.01.2017 and that the petitioner has not furnished any explanation to such notice. Therefore, he contended that the respondent has passed the order of cancellation since the petitioner failed to respond to the show cause notice. Even though, he made such submission, he fairly admitted to the position that the impugned order does not discuss the reasons for cancelling the registra....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... In this case, it has not been done so. Therefore, I am of the view that the matter has to go back to the respondent for passing a fresh order after hearing the objections of the petitioner as well. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. Consequently, the matter is remitted back to the respondent for passing fresh order after hearing the objections of t....