Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (6) TMI 202

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at appellant M/s. Cipla Ltd are engaged in the manufacture of P.P. Medicines falling under chapter 30042013 for the schedule to Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They are also manufacturing non excisable goods i.e. medicaments containing alchohol or narcotics drugs within same manufacturing premises on which no excise duty is payable. The appellant have availed Cenvat credit in respect of input use....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... was non known that which input and how much quantity will be used for non excisable goods therefore they have correctly taken credit at the time of receipt. As per Rule 14, the interest is chargeable only incase where the Cenvat credit is wrongly availed. In the present case since credit was correctly availed Rule 14 is not applicable, accordingly, interest is not chargeable. She also submits tha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Pvt. Ltd. 2072 (279) ELT 209 (Kar.) (g) CCE Vs. Pearl Insulation Ltd. 2012 (281) ELT 192 (Kar.) (h) CCE Vs. Gokaldas Images (P) Ltd. 2012 (278) ELT 590 (Kar) (i) CCE Vs. Strategic Engg (P) Ltd. 2014 (310) ELT 509 (Mad.) (j) Gurmehar Construction Vs. CCD 2014-TIOL-1205-CESTAT-DEL. 3. On the other hand, Shri. S.V. Nair, Ld. Asstt. Commissioner(A.R.) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ble goods, they have teken credit therefore there is no doubt that credit was availed wrongly. Accordingly, interest provisions of Rule 14 is clearly applicable. He also placed reliance on the following judgments: (a) Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-l Vs. GL & V India Pvt Ltd[2015(321) ELT 611 (Bom.)] (b) Commissioner of C. ex. & cus., Raipur Vs. Vandana Vidyut Ltd [2016(331) ELT 231 (Chhat....