1970 (12) TMI 3

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... year 1962-63, the Income-tax Officer estimated the net income from this truck at Rs. 2,000. He observed that since net profit was being fixed, there was no question of allowing depreciation on the truck separately. At the same time the Income-tax Officer made calculation for ascertaining the written down value of the truck. According to the calculation, the written down value for the assessment year 1962-63 came to Rs. 13,360, and depreciation at the rate of 25 per cent. came to Rs. 3,340. The assessee claimed deduction on account of depreciation at the figure of Rs. 7,500 on the basis of the cost price of the truck (Rs. 30,000). The assessee's claim on this point was not accepted by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. But, the Appellate....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y notional allowance that might be permissible under section 10(2)(vi) and (via). The provision of section 43(6)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is similar to the provision of section 10(5)(b) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. So, the principle laid down by the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Vankadam Lakshminarayana's case will govern the present case also. Annexure " E " to the statement of the case is a copy of the Appellate Tribunal's order dated April 12, 1964. After referring to the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court the Tribunal observed that the principle of the case applies with equal force to the facts of the present case. It, therefore, appears that, according to the finding of the Tribunal, no depreciation was actually ....