Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (6) TMI 149

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and ordered for its recovery under Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 read with Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant also moved miscellaneous applications praying for stay in all the appeals without insisting on mandatory pre-deposit of 7.5% of the amount of duty or penalty as provided under the amended provisions of Section 35F w.e.f. 06/08/2014. Various arguments were advanced in support of these miscellaneous applications and various case laws also submitted and argued. After due consideration and hearing, the Tribunal passed Interim order No. 70-76/2016 dt. 30/08/2016 in which the appellant was directed to comply with the requirements of Section 35F and intimate the Registry within a period of one month. Again....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....urt, the matter was heard on 09/02/2017. On behalf of the appellant Shri Joseph Kodianthara, Sr. Advocate was heard and the Revenue was represented  by Shri Mohammad Yousaf, Addl. Commissioner(AR). 3.     The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the common  issue in these appeals which arise out of the same impugned order is  alleged irregular availment of CENVAT credit. The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of automobile tyres classifiable under Chapter 40 of the  Central Excise Tariff. Tyres are supplied by the appellant both as Original Equipment (OEM) to automobile manufacturers as well as for the Replacement Market(RM). The appellant procures from outside the flaps  and t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a against this order, made before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala as well as reiterated before the Tribunal in the present hearing is as follows:- i.  The impugned order seeks to reverse CENVAT credit availed  on the duty paid on flaps and tubes by taking the view that it is inadmissible under the category of inputs as well as accessories. However at the time of clearance of the tyres, value of the tubes and flaps are also included in the said tyres and Central Excise duty has been paid on the total value including that of flaps and tubes. In this way, even if the CENVAT credit is alleged to have been wrongly taken, the same stands reversed at the time of clearance. ii.  The appellant has also submitted Chartered Acc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....kes the colour of deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 only when the appeal is filed, the date of filing of appeal shall be deemed to be the date of deposit made in terms of the said sections. 3.3 In case of any short-payment or non-payment of the amount stipulated under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, the appeal filed by the appellant is liable for rejection. The circular states that payments made during the course of investigation or audit prior to the date on which appeal is filed can be considered to be deposit made towards the fulfilment of stipulation under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The appellant had sub....