2017 (6) TMI 93
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....l) And Mr. B. Ravichandran, Member (Technical) Present for the Appellant: Mr. S. Sunil, Advocate. Present for the Respondent: Mr. Govind Dixit, D.R. ORDER PER: B. RAVICHANDRAN The brief facts of the case are that M/s. Pankaj Enterprises, New Delhi imported heavy melting scrap from Cyprus and sold the consignment on high seas sale basis to M/s. Shirish Business Ventures Pvt. Ltd. The....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... and M/s. Pankaj Enterprises filed appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals) the same was decided by the Commissioner (Appeals) vide order dated 13.12.2012. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeals setting aside the penalties on these two parties. Separately, the original order was reviewed by the Commissioner and appeal was preferred by Revenue before the Commissioner (Appeals). The said a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... proceedings are without any legal sanctity. 4. Ld. A.R. submitted that the first appellate authority order was passed in a hasty manner without waiting for the review period available to the Revenue. Further, the appellants who appeared before the Commissioner (Appeals) at the time of second decision and sought adjournment did not present the presence of first appellate order already issued on....
TaxTMI