2011 (3) TMI 1727

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....DGEMENT Hon'ble Rajiv Sharma, J. Since common questions of law and facts are involved in both the revisions, they are being decided by a common order. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned Standing Counsel. Through these revisions under Section 11 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, the applicant has assailed the order dated 26.2.2011 passed by the Trade Tax Tribunal, Bench-I, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he order dated 1.2.2011, the applicant preferred second appeal before the Trade Tax Tribunal Bench-I, Lucknow. The Tribunal, vide order dated 26.2.2011, partly allowed the appeal and modified the order dated 1.2.2011 passed by the Additional Commissioner to the effect that 70% of the disputed tax shall remain stayed during the pendency of the first appeal. Feeling aggrieved, the applicant preferre....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s that the power of stay should be judicially exercised and the order should be passed after proper application of sound principles for exercising discretion and the application of stay should be treated casually and the authority should not pass the routine order. In support of the aforesaid submissions, learned Counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case....