Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (5) TMI 1062

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(BY SRI. K.G. KAMATH, ADVOCATE) RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.K. VEDAMURTHY, ADVOCATE) O R D E R Sri. T.K. Vedamurthy, learned AGA., accepts notice for the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, these cases are being decided at this stage itself. 3. The petitioner has approached this Court with an extremely limited prayer to direct the respondent No.2, the Joint Commi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... order dated 31.03.2016, the respondent No.2 partly allowed the appeal. But gave unwarranted directions to the 1st respondent to deprive the legitimate benefit of exemption of Sales to SEZ units against Form-I. Following the directions issued by respondent No.2, respondent No.1 issued a demand notice, dated 12.08.2016, after re-computing the turnover and petitioner's tax liability by levying tax ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pplication with regard to the demand notice dated 12.08.2016 before the respondent No.1. For the total turnover arrived by respondent No.1 was on the basis of Form VAT 240 submitted by the petitioner which was inclusive of the sales made to SEZ unit and by mistake the 1st respondent had once again estimated the interstate sales to SEZ Unit without declaration forms and subjected the same to turnov....