Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2017 (5) TMI 1062

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(BY SRI. K.G. KAMATH, ADVOCATE) RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.K. VEDAMURTHY, ADVOCATE) O R D E R Sri. T.K. Vedamurthy, learned AGA., accepts notice for the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, these cases are being decided at this stage itself. 3. The petitioner has approached this Court with an extremely limited prayer to direct the respondent No.2, the Joint Commi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... order dated 31.03.2016, the respondent No.2 partly allowed the appeal. But gave unwarranted directions to the 1st respondent to deprive the legitimate benefit of exemption of Sales to SEZ units against Form-I. Following the directions issued by respondent No.2, respondent No.1 issued a demand notice, dated 12.08.2016, after re-computing the turnover and petitioner's tax liability by levying tax ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pplication with regard to the demand notice dated 12.08.2016 before the respondent No.1. For the total turnover arrived by respondent No.1 was on the basis of Form VAT 240 submitted by the petitioner which was inclusive of the sales made to SEZ unit and by mistake the 1st respondent had once again estimated the interstate sales to SEZ Unit without declaration forms and subjected the same to turnov....