2017 (5) TMI 1013

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....evasion of Central Excise duty by floating a dummy unit by name "Kavya Electronics    & Communications" (hereinafter referred to as KEC) and routing the same clearances thereat, remaining within SSI exemption limit of Rs. 1 crore.  It was also alleged that they were manufacturing and clearing the goods with brand name of M/s.Digicontrols Northern Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as DIGI). Hence no exemption was available under SSI for those goods.  Original authority confirmed duty demand of Rs. 15,68,141/-  and Rs. 25,78,477/-  under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 with interest thereon, imposed equal penalty under Section 11AC ibid and also imposed penalties against authorized signatory of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oned the brand name as "LG 301 Ultra".  For these reasons,  he held the adjudication order not sustainable for the allegation that LEC had cleared goods under the brand name of DIGI. 6.   With regard to the second allegation of floating a dummy unit, here also, the lower appellate authority has analyzed the issue and found that the said allegation is not sustainable. The relevant portion of the impugned order is reproduced below : "7.   As regards the allegation of floating a dummy unit i.e. M/s.KEC, while the Appellants have furnished documentary evidence such as, registration with Income Tax, Sales Tax, Industries/Labour Department, Central Excise declaration etc. in support of their contention that M/s....