2017 (5) TMI 1003

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Dixit, DR for the Respondent ORDER Per Archana Wadhwa: After hearing both the sides, duly represented by Shri Deepak Thakur, learned advocate appearing for the appellant and Shri Shri Govind Dixit, learned DR appearing for the Revenue, we find that the issue pertains to refund claim of SAD, in terms of notification No. 102/07 -Cus dated 14.9.07, which allows the refund subject to the fac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....T department on 23.9.2008. It is only after the confirmation of payment of VAT by the Sales Tax department that the application actually which was filed by them on 26.8.2008 was endorsed as 'admit". As such, the appellants contention is that the Revenue having made the inquiry on 2.9.2008, it has to be held that application for refund of SAD was in their possession prior to said date, in which....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cation. As such, the Revenues' contention that inquiry from the VAT department was made as a Misc. inquiry cannot be appreciated. 5.   After carefully considering the submissions made by both the sides, we find that admittedly, the department wrote a letter on 02.9.08 to VAT department seeking clarification on factual position, as regards the appellants claim of payment of VAT. We....