AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2017 (5) TMI 450
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Kaushik, Advocate for the respondent ORDER Per ASHOK JINDAL: The Revenue is in appeal against the impugned order wherein Commissioner (Appeals) has allowed the refund in cash on the premises that the respondent is not able to utilize the cenvat credit account. 2. The facts of the case are that the respondents filed refund claim before this Tribunal and the Tribunal has held....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ents have not surrendered the registration certificate, therefore, the refund was rightly allowed by the adjudicating authority in Cenvat credit account. The Commissioner (Appeals) fell in error holding that as the unit is closed, therefore, they are not able to utilize the credit, the refund be given in cash. Therefore, the impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals) is factually inc....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the submissions. 6. The sole ground of the Revenue is that the order of the adjudicating authority is correct as on the date of passing of the order by the adjudicating authority, respondent was registered with the central excise department and have not in existence. I find that in this case, on the date of sanctioning of the refund by the adjudicating authority, the responden....