Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (5) TMI 367

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....astur-Senior Advocate with Mr.Niraj Sheth and Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the respondents ORDER P. C. 1. The tribunal has dismissed the appeal of the Revenue by the order dated 13th September, 2013. That is why this further appeal. The assessment year in question is 2002-03. 2. It is submitted that the questions proposed at pages 3 and 4 (para 4) are all substantial questions of law arising....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....an order on 7th October, 2005 deleting the disallowance of procurement expenses and the computer expenses. 5. The Revenue did not accept this order and challenged it in the appeal before the tribunal. As far as the Revenue's request was concerned, the tribunal found that all the three grounds of appeal cannot be entertained. The two assessment years, namely, 2001-02 and 2003-02 raised these....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d before the first appellate authority. That authority called for certain remand reports from the assessing officer and after going through the remand reports as well as evidence submitted by the assessee, the first appellate authority was satisfied with the submission of the assessee that the services were actually rendered by the I-Cap to the assessee. However, he disallowed the 10% of the commi....