2012 (7) TMI 1022

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to the tune of Rs. 9,68,087/-. It is submitted and prayed that the amount of TDS payable as per Sec.94C of the IT Act, 1961 have already been deducted and paid on 25-5-2005. 2. At the outset, ld.AR has informed that the correct amount should be Rs. 20,02,500/- instead of the amount mentioned in the ground. Ld.AR has therefore pleaded to correct the amount noted in the grounds of appeal. 3. While framing the assessment u/s.143(3) vide order dated 29.11.2007, it was observed by the AO that certain payments have been made to sub-contractors amounting to Rs. 31,84,737/- without deduction of tax at source, hence contravening the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of IT Act. The assessee-firm is in the business of building construction and est....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in March, 2005 was deposited in government account on 25.5.05, and as per amendment brought in section 40a(ia) vide Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from 1.4.2005, the appellant gets relief of Rs. 9,68,087." 5. Having head the submissions of both the sides, we are of the view that now this issue is directly covered by a decision of Hon'ble Calcutta High Court pronounced in the case of CIT vs. Virgin Creations (Appeal No.302 of 2007 [GA No.3200/2011] order dated 23/11/2011), wherein it was held as under:- "The Court: We have herd Mr.Nizamuddin and gone through the impugned judgment and order. We have also examined the point formulated for which the present appeal is sought to be admitted. It is argued by Mr.Nizamuddin....