2013 (10) TMI 1459
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....to Rs. 2,06,443/- as capital expenditure. 2.1 That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred on facts and in law in not appreciating that expenditure incurred on building new wall, pursuant to demolition of existing wall by the municipality was in the nature of revenue expenditure. 3. That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred on facts and in law in upholding the action of the assessing officer in disallowing provision for 'Sheraton preferred guest scheme' amounting to Rs. 38,76,997/-. 3.1 That the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred on facts and in law in not treating provision made for 'Sheraton Preferred Guest Scheme' as liability in holding the expenditure towards this as a capital expenditure." Ground No. 1 relates to disallowance of an amount of Rs. 1,94,220/- by treating it as capital expenditure. 3. Briefly the facts are, the assessee is a company engaged in the business of hoteliering. For the impugned assessment year the assessee filed its return of income on 27-11-2006 declaring total income of Rs. 26,38,92,790/-. During the scrutiny assessment proceeding, the Assessing Officer on verification of the a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... incurred for acquiring software cannot be allowed as a revenue expenditure. 8. We have heard the submissions of the parties and perused the materials on record as well as the orders of the revenue authorities on this issue. It is not disputed that the assessee has claimed the expenditure claimed towards purchase of application software as revenue expenditure by debiting it to the profit and loss account. However, as can be seen there is an amendment to the old Appendix-1 of IT Rules 1962 as per which item-5 under the head machinery and plant reads as under:- (5) Computers including computer software. The rate of depreciation is provided at 60%. Note-7 to the aforesaid appendix defines computer software as under:- "(7) 'Computer software' means any computer programme recorded on any disk, tape, media or other information storage device." 9. The aforesaid amendment under the old appendix-1 is applicable for assessment years 2003-04 to 2005-06. Under the new appendix-1 which is applicable for the assessment years 2006-07 onwards, the same item-5 has been retained along with Note-7. Thus, as per the old Appendix-1 and new appendix-1, computer software a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....on behalf of the assessee that the expenditure on repairs and maintenance have been incurred for preservation of existing assets. While contesting each of the items of expenditures disallowed the assessee contended that none of the expenditure was in the nature of enduring benefit but the expenditure was towards maintenance and preservation of existing asset and it was only of a recurring nature. It was submitted that certain items like reflective cones, fixing of tiles, false ceiling, laying of BT road at Hotel, construction of compound wall, tiles, fixing of tiles, kota stone granites, digitization of hotel cleaning etc., were made only to facilitate the running of the hotel more profitably and that it was not in the nature of expenditure incurred to bring into existence a new asset or to obtain a new or fresh advantage. It was submitted that company has incurred expenditure of Rs. 8,30,317/- towards marble maintenance and which is required for cleaning and shining of the marble and which will be done by a third party on day to day basis. Similarly, AC refrigeration work is day to day maintenance of various ACs fixed at the hotel rooms. With regard to the expenditure of Rs. 1,33,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....o the MCH. The letter dated 29-9-2005 of MCH to the land acquisition Officer also clearly mentions about the consent given by the assessee for handing over of the land for the purpose of road widening at free of cost to the MCH. Thus, as can be seen the assessee had to part with its portion of land for road widening purposes of the MCH and accordingly the existing compound wall has to be demolished and a new boundary wall has to be constructed by incurring expenditure of Rs. 2,06,443/-. 14. From these facts, it is clear that the purpose of construction of boundary wall is not to bring a new asset but only for the purpose of preserving and maintaining an already existing asset. Therefore, in our view the expenditure claimed towards construction of the compound wall is allowable as revenue expenditure. The Assessing Officer is directed to delete the addition of Rs. 2,06,443.00. The ground raised is allowed. 15. In ground No. 3 the assessee has challenged the confirmation of disallowance of provision made for Sheraton preferred guest scheme amounting to Rs. 38,76,997/-. 16. Briefly the facts are, on verification of the information submitted by the assessee during the assessme....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....or not. It was submitted that the system of accounting followed is also recognised by AS-1. In support of such contention, the assessee also relied upon a number of decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, different High Courts as well as different Benches of the ITAT. 18. The CIT (A) however rejecting the contentions of the assessee sustained the disallowance by holding as under : "9. I have gone through the submissions of the appellant. Even though any liability had arisen during the year on account of such scheme, it is clear that every guest would not finally avail of this scheme. Therefore, the liability cannot be said as capable of being estimated with any reasonable certainty. Such liability cannot be said as a liability in preasentie. Even the letter dated 5.10.1999 from Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc. States on page 3 thereof " when a hotel accepts a free night award, the programme then compensates the hotel or resort". In fact, the appellant has itself admitted that it was only a provision and even that the said provision had been made only on the basis of the past experience of the appellant itself. Accordingly, it also clear that the provision ma....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ial year 2005-06 out of the provision. He has further contended that whatever amount is left out is reversed in the books and offered to tax. A perusal of the statements submitted as at pages 111-113 of the paper book shows that out of total provision of Rs. 49,48,543/-the assessee has paid an amount of Rs. 28,73,204/- and the assessee has offered as income by reversal of earlier years provision during the financial year 2005-06 relevant to the assessment year under dispute. The learned A.R. has further contended that similar provisions made for SPG scheme in the earlier and subsequent assessment year have been accepted. On a consideration of totality of facts and circumstances, we are inclined to remit the matter back to the file of the Assessing Officer for the purpose of verifying whether actually the assessee has paid the provision made and whatever provision was not paid was offered as income in the subsequent assessment years. If on verification of facts and materials on record the assessee's claim is found to be correct, there will be no case for disallowance of the provision made. The order passed by the CIT (A) to this extent is set aside and the issue is remitted to t....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI