Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (5) TMI 186

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Tax, Bangalore. The issue involved in all these six appeals is identical and therefore, all the appeals are being disposed of by this common order. The details of six appeals are given herein below: Appeal No. Period of dispute Amount ST/20597/2016 Nov. 08 April 09 Rs.4,00,766/- ST/20598/2016 Oct. Dec. 10 Rs.13,72,760/- ST/20599/2016 Jan. March 11 Rs.17,65,541/- ST/20600/2016 April June 11 Rs.18,17,567/- ST/20601/2016 July Sep. 11 Rs.31,26,705/- ST/20602/2016 Oct. Dec. 11 Rs.23,07,857/-   2. Briefly the facts of the present case are that appellants are engaged in providing information technology enabled services to its group entities located outside India and the na....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the said order, the appellant filed appeal before the Commissioner (A) who vide the impugned order dated 1.2.2016 set aside all the Orders-in-Original and allowed the appeals by way of remand. The Commissioner (A) in principle sanctioned the refund but held that the appellant has no locus standii to claim the refund amount representing CENVAT credit of input service taxes, since this was already reimbursed by the customer. The learned Commissioner (A) also observed that given this aspect of reimbursement of taxes was not discussed and mentioned in any of the Orders-in-Original or the show-cause notices issued before, the original adjudicating authority should reconsider this specific aspect as well, while considering the claims. Against th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oner of Central Excise before the expiry of one year from the relevant date in such form and manner as may be prescribed and the application shall be accompanied by such documentary or other evidence (including the documents referred to in section 12A) as the applicant may furnish to establish that the amount of duty of excise and interest, if any, paid on such duty in relation to which such refund is claimed was collected from, or paid by, him and the incidence of such duty and interest, if any, paid on such duty had not been passed on by him to any other person : Provided that where an application for refund has been made before the commencement of the Central Excises and Customs Laws (Amendment) Act, 1991, such application shall....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....inputs in accordance with the rules made, or any notification issued, under this Act; d) the duty of excise and interest, if any, paid on such duty paid by the manufacturer, if he had not passed on the incidence of such duty and interest, if any, paid on such duty to any other person; e) the duty of excise and interest, if any, paid on such duty borne by the buyer, if he had not passed on the incidence of such duty and interest, if any, paid on such duty to any other person; f) the duty of excise and interest, if any, paid on such duty borne by any other such class of applicants as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify : Provided further that no notification under cl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is bad in law. Further, the counsel submitted that the order of the Commissioner (A) has travelled beyond the scope of show-cause notices and the Orders-in-Original. He further submitted that it is a settled position of law that order cannot be passed on a fresh matter which is not mentioned in the show-cause notice and in support of this submissions, he relied upon the following decisions: i. Dayanand Medical College & Hospital: 2014-TIOL-1515-CESTAT-DEL. ii. Deepak & Co. vs. CCE, New Delhi: 2014-TIOL-1233-CESTAT-DEL. Further, he also submitted that the appellant cannot be put in a worse off position than originally he was by reason of an appeal and in support of this submission, he relied on following decisions: ....