2017 (5) TMI 140
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....) for the Revenue ORDER Per: Shri P. K. Choudhary Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of tyres, tubes and flaps, classifiable under Chapter 40 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise upon finalization of the provisional assessment ordered the excess amount paid by the assessee is refundable subj....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....se where the duty of excise is paid provisionally under this Act, the date of adjustment of duty after final assessment thereof. The appellant claimed that the date of communication of the adjustment of duty after final assessment is relevant. 4. The Tribunal in the case of Hindustan Times Ltd. v. Collector of Customs [1991 (56) ELT 856 (Tribunal)] in the context of refund claim filed under Sec....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s the party who is affected by the order or decision for seeking his remedies against the same, he should be made aware of passing of such order. Therefore Courts have uniformly laid down as a rule of law that for seeking the remedy the limitation starts from the date on which the order was communicated to him or the date on which it was pronounced or published under such circumstances that ....
TaxTMI