2017 (4) TMI 1078

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d against the impugned order dated 17.08.2010 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, New Delhi. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the Department initiated show cause proceedings against the appellant alleging that it is engaged in the manufacture and clearances of excisable goods namely, electric fuses and other electric parts falling under heading 8536.90 and 8548.00 of the Cent....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....posed on Shri. Manoj Kumar Sharma, partner of the appellant company. On appeal, the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) vide impugned order has upheld the duty demand and imposition of penalty on the appellant company. However, the penalty imposed on Shri. Manoj Kumar Sharma was set aside. 3. The ld. Advocate appearing for the appellant submits that the appellant is not a manufacturer, engaged in manufact....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d, the ld. DR appearing for the respondent reiterates the findings recorded in the impugned order. 5. Heard the ld. Counsel for both sides and perused the records. 6. On perusal of paragraph 3 at page 5 in the adjudication order, I find that in cross examination, Shri Debumukhiya inter-alia denied having any knowledge of the panchnama drawn by the Department. Further, Shri Mahesh Sharma, the Man....