Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (4) TMI 892

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R [Order Per: Ms. Sulekha Beevi, C.S.] 1. The above appeal is fled by the department against the order passed by Commissioner (Appeals) who upheld the sanction of refund claim of assessee. 2. The respondents were earlier operating as an EOU and in the month of November, 2011 they intimated their intention to exit from EOU scheme. Accordingly, they paid the duties applicable on finished goods in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....int Commissioner, submitted that the appellants had paid duty on the goods at the time of de-bonding from EOU scheme. They had again paid duty on the said goods at the time of clearance in DTA. The Central Excise duty paid by them while clearing the goods in DTA was collected from the customers. Therefore, the said excise duty paid by the respondents for the second time for clearing the goods is h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t by unjust enrichment and therefore the said duty is also not refundable though they have paid duty twice. 4. Against this, the Ld. Consultant Shri S.C. Choudhury, appearing on behalf of the respondent, reiterated the findings in the impugned order. He submitted that the excise duty was paid on the finished goods twice. Therefore, respondent having paid excess duty, is eligible for refund. He re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....atory requirement for de-bonding. The duty has been paid second time by the respondent while clearing the goods in DTA. This amount also cannot be refunded as it is hit by unjust enrichment since the duty has been collected by respondent from the customers. When the duty is paid by the respondent as a mandatory condition for conversion of EOU to DTA, the duty paid is Central Excise duty on the goo....