Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1969 (10) TMI 2

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... common for the assessment years 1957-58 to 1959-60. They were made under section 35 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, to rectify the earlier orders. For instance, in respect of the assessment for the year 1958-59, as a result of rectification, a sum of Rs. 30,347 was added to the taxable total income. In respect of the other two years too, additions were made. It appears that the assessee had e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s not clear from the orders of the Income-tax Officer whether he considered only a portion of or the whole of the establishment expenses as relating to capital expenditure not entitled to deduction. The Income-tax Officer called upon the petitioner by a notice to show cause why the earlier assessment orders should not be rectified under section 35. In answer, the petitioner was technical in its ob....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ven deduction of, included wholly or partly capital expenditure referable to the capital recoveries. On that view, we consider that the Income-tax Officer acted within his power under section 35. The last contention for the petitioner is that the order of the Income-tax Officer does not ex facie show whether and, if so, how the entire establishment charges related to capital expenditure. That is ....