Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1968 (11) TMI 23

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ision of section 10 were attracted ? " The facts, as narrated in the statement of the case, are that the applicant who was a son of the deceased, late Inayatur Rahaman Khan, who died on June 25, 1958, submitted a statement of account before the Assistant Controller of Estate Duty, declaring the principal value of the estate of the deceased at Rs. 38,637. The Assistant Controller determined the principal value of the estate at Rs. 1,49,937. The principal value so determined included a sum of Rs. 45,000 being the value of six house properties at Secunderabad. It was claimed before the Assistant Controller that the deceased had transferred these house properties to his sons and daugthers by oral gift known as hiba under Mohommadan law, more t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ther the income-tax authorities were right in holding that the donor continued to be in possession and enjoyment of the properties gifted to his sons and daughters. This question, in our view, is one of fact to be determined from the facts and circumstances of each case. The learned advocate for the assessee has taken us through the statement of Faru Ahmed, son of the donor, in which he said that he used to collect rents from all the properties and hand them over to his elder brother, Mumtaz Ahmed Khan, who after defraying expenses such as municipal taxes etc., used to spend the rest of the money on maintenance of the family consisting of all brothers, sisters, till their marriage and his late father, that there are accounts maintained and ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....income was utilised to meet the expense of his late father. It is clear, however, that, as the Central Board of Direct Taxes observed, the children to whom the gift was made by the donor did not enjoy the property to the entire exclusion of the donor which is also one of the requirements under section 10 for excluding the gifted properties from the estate of the deceased. Section 10 of the Estate Duty Act is as follows : " Gifts whenever made where donor not entirely excluded. --Property taken under any gift, whenever made, shall be deemed to pass on the donor's death to the extent that bona fide possession and enjoyment of it was not immediately assumed by the donee and thenceforward retained to the entire exclusion of the donor or of an....