Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (4) TMI 429

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ods and service tax paid on input services. The appellants were issued periodical show cause notices from the period 4/2003 to 6/2012 alleging irregular availment of CENVAT credit on MS items used for fabrication of capital goods, repair and maintenance of capital goods. So also there was allegation that appellants had availed irregular credit on welding electrodes used for fabrication and repair and maintenance of capital goods. The present appeals relate to the period September, 2012 March, 2013. After due process of law, the original authority confirmed the demand, interest and imposed penalty. In appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the same. Hence these appeals. 3. On behalf of the appellant, the Ld. Consultant Sh. Venkata Prasad....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he findings in the impugned order. 5. I have heard the submissions made before me. The allegation is that the appellants are not eligible for credit on MS items used in the factory. On behalf of the Ld. AR, it is submitted that appellant has not produced sufficient documents to establish that MS items were used for repair and maintenance. This is countered by the Ld. Consultant who has submitted that the Department has issued a letter dated 19.12.2007 requiring the appellant to reverse the credit stating that the MS items used for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery are not eligible for credit. That even after replay to such letter, the department has not required appellant to produce any further details from the part of the appe....