Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (4) TMI 212

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pellant (M/s. Lord Chloro Alkali Limited) formerly known as Modi Alkalies & Chemicals Limited, were engaged in the manufacture of hydrogen gas liable to Central Excise duty. The other three appellants were also located in the vicinity of the first appellant and were engaged in the compression and bottling of hydrogen gas produced as a by-product in the manufacture of caustic soda by the first appellant. The Central issue involved in these appeals is that Appellants 2 to 4 are basically front companies floated by Appellant No. 1 in order to avail small scale unit exemption in terms of Notification No. 8/2003-C.E., dated 1-3-2003. The Revenue initiated proceedings against the appellants to deny the exemption and to demand excise duty. 2.&e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....umption. The appellants also submitted the documents showing incorporation of the appellants' units as independent legal entities. 3. Ld. AR submitted that the modus operandi adopted by Appellant No. 1 in creating front companies have been well established in the past proceedings which reached up to Hon'ble Supreme Court. Appellant No. 1 had provided unsecured loans or had arranged for such loan from finance companies whose whereabouts are not known to the Directors of these companies. Ld. AR also submitted that the overall control of other three units essentially remained with Appellant No. 1 has been brought out by various evidences like location of the units, involvement of staff of the first appellant, marketing of the final pro....