Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2017 (3) TMI 1445

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ital goods used in the manufacture of their final product. 3. During the course of the verification of records, the respondent was asked to furnish the inputs stock variation report. The respondent submitted the report which shows that the difference between the stock of inputs as reflected in the records and the physical stock of inputs lying in the factory of the respondent. The department is of the view that the inputs found short were not used in or relation to the manufacturer of final products, therefore, the cenvat credit of the duty paid on these goods is not admissible to the respondent. In these set of facts, the proceedings were initiated against the respondent and it was held that the respondent is not entitled to avail cenvat ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... found short i.e. to the small variation of 0.05% of the total inputs received. 8. I find that the similar issue came up before this Tribunal in the case of Maruti Udyog Limited (Supra), wherein this Tribunal observed as under: 6. We have perused the records and considered the submissions made by both sides. The recovery of Modvat Credit has been orderd under the impugned order on the basis that the appellant has failed to fully account for the inputs (Rule 57-l). This Rule allows recovery of the credits incorrectly or improperly taken. In the present case, there is no allegation that original credit taken was incorrect or improper. The allegation is that, in view of the shortages noticed, the appellant has failed in showing that the inp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he evidence on record does not indicate any diversion of inputs in contravention of rules relating to utilisation of inputs. The demand is merely based on the shortages detected during physical tallying, that too without taking into accunt the excesses noticed. Since there is no evidence, that the excesses are not the result of clandestine receipt of inputs, the same view is required to be taken in regard to shortages also, that the shortages are not the result of any clandestine or unauthorised utilisation of the inputs. The shortages thrown up also do not account for much. The appellants management as well as its auditor have accepted the differences between the physical stocks and the procurement as normal and something to be put up with....