2017 (3) TMI 1426
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....enkatesh ORDER 1.Issue Notice. Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. With the consent of the learned counsels for parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal. 2.This writ petition is directed against the assessment order dated 15.10.2014, which pertains to the assessment year 2011-12. 3.A perusal of the impugn....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n was made of his records, the Enforcement Officials had collected a sum of Rs. 2,51,732/-. In addition thereto, a cheque bearing no.070057 dated 12.07.2011 drawn on South Indian Bank, Hosur, for a sum of Rs. 41,040/- was also handed over to the concerned officials. 6.It is therefore, the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that, apart from other apparent errors in the impugned....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nsel for the petitioner that no orders have been passed in the said representation. 9.Mr.Venkatesh, who appears for the respondent, says that since a representation has been made under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, this Court could direct disposal of the said representation. 10.Having heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties, I find, that the course of a....
TaxTMI