2017 (3) TMI 1268

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t : Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv., Ms. Niranjana Singh, Adv., Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. ORDER Leave granted. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties at this stage finally. The appellant/assessee is involved in undertaking transport contracts. During the relevant year, it entered into a contract with the army for carriage of goods and personnel etc. In this regard, an amount of Rs. 74,8....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) (ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'), disallowed the amount of Rs. 55,59,585/- and added it back to the income of the assessee. The Assessing Officer computed the income of the assessee as per the provisions of Section 144 of the Act which worked out to RS.9,93,069/-. Against the order of the Assessing Officer, an appeal was preferred by the assessee. T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ule 29D of Income Tax Rules. Sub-Rule (3) of Rule 29D stipulates that the particulars under the third proviso to clause(i) of sub-section (3) of Section 194C to be furnished by a contractor responsible for paying any sum to such sub-contractor shall be in Form No. 15J. The High Court has treated the filling of the said Form as a prerequisite and on that basis held that provisions of Section 40(a)(....