TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2017 (3) TMI 1143
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Appellants Shri. Ashutosh Nath, Asstt. Commissioner(A.R.) for the Respondent Per : Ramesh Nair The appellant is Govt. of India undertaking and they are engaged in the manufacture of readymade garment falling under Chapter 62 and other textile articles falling under Chapter 63. They have got the goods manufactured on the job work basis from the various job worker. The case of the department is....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....een manufacturing the product under brand name of the appellant and entire control was of the appellant therefore the appellant is required to pay the duty. Being aggrieved by the Order of the Commissioner(Appeals) appellant is before us. 2. Shri. Prasad Paranjape, Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that as per the Rule 4 of the Central Excise Rules, 2001, in case of job work by the job worker....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nvolved is related to the interpretation of law an special provisions for manufacturing of textile articles therefore suppression of facts is not involved, hence no penalty under Section 11AC can be imposed. 3. Shri. Ashutosh Nath, Ld. Asstt. Commissioner(A.R.) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. He further submits that since the job worker was under ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... of textile articles, we do not find any malafide on the part of the appellant, we therefore set aside penalty imposed under Section 11AC corresponding to the demand of Rs. 67,616/-. As regard the demand in respect of goods of Chapter 63 for the period October, 1999 to March, 2003, we find that demand on raw material supplier on this goods was fastened w.e.f. 1-4-2003 as per amended Rule 12B of Ce....