Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (3) TMI 1134

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., etc. chargeable to central excise duty under Chapter 72 of the Central Excise Tariff Act. They avail cenvat credit of central excise duty paid on inputs and capital goods used in or in relation to their manufacturer of finished goods. The dispute in this case is about eligibility for cenvat credit in respect of items viz. Boiler Parts, Silo System, Boiler Radiation Hopper, Turbine Air Unit, EOT Crane, Hook Conveyor, Materials Handling System, Platform for kiln, coal drier, Stack Structure, cooling tower, Girth Gear, Kiln Gear Box, etc. The appellant had availed cevnat credit amounting to Rs. 91,49,180/- in respect of these items during the period from March, 2009 to June, 2009. The Department was of the view that these items are neither i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Goods' under Rule 2(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and have come to the conclusion that the credit will not be allowable under this Rule. However, we find that the credit of duty paid on Welding Electrodes has been held allowable by several decisions of this Tribunal and hence the issue is no more res integra. We also find that several High Courts have also allowed such credit considering the same as allowable within the definition of "Input" under the Cenvat Credit Rules. One such reference can be made to the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh in the case of Ambuja Cements Eastern Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur, 2010 (256) E.L.T. 690 (Chhattisgarh), = 2010-TIOL-309-HC-CHHATTISGARH-CX, wherein welding e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stem, furnace, etc. cannot be suspended in mid-air. They will need to be suitably supported to facilitate smooth functioning of such machines. It is obvious that the structural items have been suitably worked upon for this purpose. Accordingly, the goods fabricated, using such structurals, will have to be considered as parts of the relevant machines. The definition of 'Capital Goods' includes, components, spares and accessories of such capital goods. Accordingly, applying the "User Test" to the facts in hand, we have no hesitation in holding that the structural items used in the fabrication of support structures would fall within the ambit of 'Capital Goods' as contemplated under Rule 2(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, hence will be entitled ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....edit as capital goods. The Hon'ble Madras High court in Thiru Arooran Sugar - 2015-TIOL-1734-HC-MAD.CX held that credit on MS Plates, angles, channels utilized in construction/ erection of plant were eligible for credit. The High Court observed that the principle laid-down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajasthan Spinning and Weaving Mills Limited (supra) is applicable to such situation. 7. We note that the Tribunal has been consistently following the ratio that the steel items when they are used in fabrication of capital goods and their accessories inside the manufacturer premises are eligible for credit by applying 'user test' as evolved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajasthan Spinning and Weaving Mills Limited (supra). A refe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....case of Mundra Ports & Special Economic Zone Ltd., 2015 (04) LCX0197 = 2015 (39) S.T.R. 726 (Guj.), wherein it was observed that the amendment made on 7-7-2009 cannot be held to be clarificatory and as such would be applicable only prospectively. 15. We find that the controversy can be laid to rest by making a reference to the decision of the Apex Court in the case of CCE, Jaipur v. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd., 2010 (255) E.L.T. 481 (S.C.), wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has considered an identical issue of steel plates and MS channels used in the fabrication of chimney for diesel generating set. The credit stands allowed in the light of Rule 57Q of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944. In the said judgment, the Apex Co....