Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (3) TMI 1110

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e principles of natural justice as the respondent failed to provide an opportunity of personal hearing, inspite of asking for the same. By consent of parties, the main writ petitions themselves are taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself since the issue involved in these cases lies in a narrow campus. 3. Short facts that required for consideration in these writ petitions are as follows: The petitioner is a registered dealer under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax, 2006, engaged in Civil Construction Works. They filed the monthly returns for the assessment years 2010-2011 to 2014-2015 periodically. On 04.09.2015, the business place of the petitioner was inspected by the Enforcement Wing Officials followed by issuing a notice....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... relied on the Judgment of the Division Bench of this court in SRC Projects Private Limited Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Chennai and Another reported in (2010) 33 VST 333 (Mad). In support of his submission regarding Web report, the learned counsel relied on an unreported decision of the learned Single Judge made in W.P.No.105/2016, etc., dated 01.03.2017. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner also relied on the circular issued by the Department dated 20.04.2001 to substantiate his contention regarding the personal hearing of the petitioner. 7. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner was given an opportunity of hearing by giving a show cause notice and the impugned or....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nch of this court had an occasion to consider the very circular and in its decision reported in (2010) 33 VST 333 (Mad), it has been observed as follows : "This court, therefore, holds that the provision of section 16(1)(a) of the said Act has to be construed in accordance with the said circular which is by way of contemporanea expositio. So when a specific demand is made for personal hearing the reasonable opportunity of showing cause should include the same in the interest of fairness in procedure." From the above decision of the Division Bench of this court, it is clear that when the assessee asks for personal hearing, the same should be given by the assessing authority. In this case, the assessing authority himself though has offered....